Friday, October 30, 2009
A Crime Against Society?
In Fahrenheit 451, the government has too much control over society and have to have things their way. So I think the government doesn't want enlightened people to go revolt and sort of keep the "readers" in their place. If the government would come out and say that they lost Montag, they would present themselves as inferior and that's what they are afraid of.
Usually you think of events such as 9/11 as crimes against society. Montag's crime was only destroying a mechanical dog and supposively killing Beatty. In today's world people do far worse things than destroying a machine and killing a man. People do things like crash planes into buildings,that is definately not on the same level as murdering one man and a machine. The government just wants to keep people scared to read and intimidate them. Basically they are just getting at Montag because the government thiks reading is a crime against society, but the real crime is not letting people read.
-Kody Heitz
Love
Josh Hill
Alcohol
By: Austin Stephey
why... Maria Valle
HAPPY HALLOWEEN AND PEACE OUT:)
Achieving One of Many Goals
♪♫ Danielle Slagle ♪♫
Thursday, October 29, 2009
The Bible, Fahrenheit 451, and YOU (Gwen Montes)
"And why do you worry about clothes? See how the lilies of the field grow. They do not labor or spin. 29Yet I tell you that not even Solomon in all his splendor was dressed like one of these. 30If that is how God clothes the grass of the field, which is here today and tomorrow is thrown into the fire, will he not much more clothe you, O you of little faith? 31So do not worry, saying, 'What shall we eat?' or 'What shall we drink?' or 'What shall we wear?' 32For the pagans run after all these things, and your heavenly Father knows that you need them. 33But seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well. 34Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own."
This passage is especially important because it is quoted during the Montag's transitional period. It is also ironic that Montag should be reading this passage about not worrying about materialistic wants and needs, because at the same time on the subway an advertisement for a product is keeping Montag from absorbing the words that he is trying to read. It's almost like the words are at war with each other.
Another significant bit of biblical imagery is at the end of the book when Montag watches as the city is destroyed. Bradbury uses language and imagery from the Bible to resolve the novel. In the last pages, as Montag and Granger’s group walk upriver to find survivors after the bombing of the city, Montag tries to remember appropriate passages from the Bible. He brings to mind Ecclesiastes 3:1, “To everything there is a season,” and also Revelations 22:2, “And on either side of the river was there a tree of life . . . and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations,” which he decides to save for when they reach the city. The verse from Revelations also speaks of the holy city of God, and the last line of the book, “When we reach the city,” implies a strong symbolic connection between the war in Montag’s world and the Apocalypse of the Bible.
I'm sure that there are more biblical parallels in Fahrenheit 451, however I felt that these were the most important.
(P.S. sorry I didn't sign it ^_^)
what does it mean to truly live?
Sometimes people should take a break form reality. Just sit, relax, and think about your day. I feel that the only way to live your life is actually living. You cant spend your whole life working or on the run because its just not healthy to put all that stress an yourself all the time. Some people do not realize that they have the potential to do amazing things. Go on, learn a new language, go skydiving, travel the world, do whatever pleases you, because the only thing that should matter is happiness, and that is the key to truly living.
-Zach Spear
Gray=No Personality Nathan Knodel
A different kind of example of this is when they go and kill the fake Montag just to please everyone. If you have to go and kill some innocent person just so people can have a few laughs then there's no way they have a true personality. Plus, I strongly believe that even seeing that man die was still not enough to please that society based on what everything we've seen in the book already. Even if they did laugh it wasn't true happiness that they were expressing.
Finally, the reason that everyone was gray to Montag in the first place is because he isn't gray. If everyone's gray in a society, then they don't look at themselves or eachother that way. They'd look at themselves the same way our society does now. But Montag isn't gray and the same as everyone else. He has color, a personality, so they looked different to him. I remember one time our youth pastor was trying to explain to us the fact about how so many people aren't saved and how we have to try to change that. To try to help us visualize it he said to walk down the hallways in school and visualize yourself in color and all those who aren't with no color. If you would do that you'd feel isolated and alone. I think that's how Montag might feel and why he's seeing people as gray rather than with color.
Baptism by Whisky
This excerpt is DEEP with emotion and connections. While reading this excerpt shivers ran down my spine. In this excerpt, the reader experiences Montag's new sense if freedom. Montag has evaded the authorities and the Hound. When Montag drenches himself in liquor it is a symbolic baptism into a new life. Once he has drenched himself in alcohol the hound will not be able to trace Montag any longer. When Montag tosses his old clothing into the river it is symbolic of him escaping his old life of ignorance and dullness for a new life of new knowledge and experiences. This passage symbolizes a door being opened, not just by the Montag but by the reader as well. The action in this passage foreshadows a new exciting part of the book.
Bob Laing
burning bright (sharief) :)
-sharief-
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Purity in Many Forms
-Austin Reichert
"Who does it affect that you are upset? None. The only person it affects is you because everyone else will move on with their lives." (Quote of the day)
Absolutly Rediculous Entertainment
It's also really funny to me when I picture how people look as they watch this. To us, seeing this, would be a movie from Hollywood. To these people this is real life drama and suspense that is actually KILLING people. Also, the fact that after the announcer..well announces that the search is over and Montag is dead they go directly into "We now take you to the Sky Room of the Hotel Lux for a half hour of Just-Before-Dawn, a program of--." This supposedly is key for everything's all fine and dandy now so you can go back to your happy life. Do these people really take a sigh of relief from that? I just thought that this form of entertainment was extremely disgusting and wanted to share.
-Brittany Jurczyk
Who Owns the Problem?
In Fahrenheit 451, there are two very good examples of blame mis-placement. Montag believes his hands stole the books, not him. But, obviously, a person's hands cannot move without the engagement of the brain, right? Right. Now, I know Montag is supposed to be the heroic, wise, non-conformist character, but is he doing anything different (in this sense) than anyone else? He isn't. Montag cannot blame his actions on his body. The action of Montag's hands stealing the books is like saying my eyes cheated on that test, not me. The action can't be done without the thought first.
Another good example is on pages 148 and 149. After Montag crossed the river, the hound lost his scent and lost track of him. So the chase decided to make the public believe that Montag changed directions just so they didn't have to admit the fault. These actions, though, unlike Montag, didn't just end in personal guilt. They ended in the homicide of an innocent man who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. All of this because the law enforcement decided to hide its mistake and not own up to the fact that it lost Montag.
So next time you are faced with a situation where you could either blame someone else for your actions or own up to them, choose the latter. After all, who owns the problem?
~ Linzey Rice
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Post Ideas for the Uncertain
1. What is reality and how is it constructed? What are the potential conflicts when one person's reality is another person's illusion?
2. What is happiness and what is the degree of importance in one's life?
3. Why does happiness seem to be so elusive for so many people?
4. What color are you? The people in the story are gray; what metapohorical color sums up your personality?
5. What is the relationships between freedom and responsibility? Along those lines, what is freedom and is it ever free? Is restriction on freedom ever a good thing?
6. How does conflict lead to change?
7. How does an individual's point of view affect the way he deals with conflict?
8. What is the relationship between decisions and consequences?
9. How do decisions and actions of characters reveal their personalities?
10. What does it mean to truly live? What kinds of things contribute to the quality of our lives?
11. What did Faber mean when he said, "I don't talk things, sir. I talk the meaning of things. I sit here and know I am alive"?
12.Why do you suppose such a low value is placed on human life in the story? Why is the society so violent in general?
Don't forget! There's a lot of imagery that can be discussed example by example. We are of no shortage for topics this week! Have fun thinking!
The Real Guy Montag
-Kenzie Smith
Monday, October 26, 2009
burning his own house
-Ellie Adams
Sunday, October 25, 2009
Beatty At His Worst
I wasn't sad at all when he died. He was a psychotic sadist anyway. I can't help but wonder what will happen now that Beatty is out of the way.
-Devyn Font
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Manipulation- Miranda Rickard
Why Farenheit 451?
Bradbury has also said that Montag resembles himself a lot. This is very interesting since Montag is a “bad guy” somewhat. He does change for the better. Why does he change? I think he changes solely because of Clarisse. Clarisse makes him think and realize that the society that he lives in is completely bogus. He also realizes that people need to slow down. Will Montag ever change and try to change the dystopian world of Fahrenheit 451?
Why did the woman burn herself, and what did the fireman think after she did. I think she burned herself to kind of set an example to the fireman that burn people and their houses. She wanted them to realize that what they were doing was wrong and that she would die for her books. This reminds me of a Rosa Parks but she didn’t kill herself. The fireman was probably wondering if burning all these houses were worth it. I probably wouldn’t kill myself for books I would probably try to get away. Fahrenheit 451 has had many surprises so far but I’m sure has more to come.
-Austin Stephey
Saturday, October 17, 2009
Ouch. That hurt.
In Fahrenheit 451, Montag starts out thinking he's a fairly happy guy. He's got a good, steady job, he's got a nice wife, and he's always got a smile on his face. Until one day Montag meets his next door neighbor, Clarisse. As we the readers find out, Clarisse basically calls Montag out and says "Whoa man, are you sure you're really ok with your life?" and Montag realizes that he isn't. He is not ok at all. He doesn't know his wife much more than he knows a random stranger on the street. His job is not as honorable or enjoyable as he once thought. He watched, helpless, as an old women sacrificed her own life for the very thing that he was employed to destroy. He feels guilty because his curiosity drove him to steal illegal books and now he actually wants to read them. He reads the books and finds to his dismay that he has no way of understanding words leaping off the page at him. His boss is out to find his books and burn them before Montag has a chance to remember what they said. All of his thoughts are just turning in circles around him and he's so confused that he just wants to scream.......
ouch.
All that because he had a few conversations with his neighbor.
Clarisse made Montag realize that the person he had become was a conformist going through the mechanical life that society had planned out for him. His life and his heart were unfulfilled and barren. Discovering that he had wasted half a lifetime by filling his soul with the insubstantial fluff of a society obsessed with instant gratification and constant distraction from meaningful emotional connections hit Montag like a ton of bricks. What Clarisse showed Montag about himself put him in a world of hurt. He learned the truth about himself and what he saw was not pretty or full of Rainbows and Skittles. His world came crashing down around his ankles, buried him up to his neck, and then suffocated him.
I think as readers we often assume that the changes Montag experiences because of his relationship with Clarisse are good things. Certainly Montag becomes what we would label a "better person" or a more "open-minded" guy, but goodness! what a mess his life seems to be.
As I said before, we as humans like to avoid pain of any kind. Unfortunately for us, the process of filling our existence on this earth with actions and achievements that actually mean something usually involves a lot of uncomfortable and even painful experiences in learning about who we are and who we want to be much like what Montag goes through in the book. Therefore the question that remains is not "will it hurt?"; the answer to that is yes. The question is "is the pain worth it?". Is pain and suffering a fair price for living a life of significance? Can we get down to the nitty gritty and look at the details of our lives, even if it makes us uncomfortable? If we can do that, we bring back hope for our world. As Mrs. Stoller often says, the key is in the details. A happy life is one that is not just a facade over a bunch of fluff but rather a real face with real feelings and real meaning.
--Taylor
Thursday, October 15, 2009
Our World Heading Towards Fahrenheit 451's
-Nathan Knodel
Montag's inner struggle
A mysterious and impetuous girl meets are stolid Montag. This girl seems awry to him for most peoople don't talk or walk about and think. Clarisse becomes his light, his guide for his thoughts.
Clarisse and Montag become walking companions. Clarisse became the trigger for the chain reaction of everything that is to come in his life. Then she vanishes but the memories of her will forever live in his heart and mind.
Montag has been taking books for a year but without thinking he did it he blames his hand as if it's its own entity. He says his hands are poisoned showing Montag's change. This "poison" stared to go up his arms and through his body symbolizing the change from his mindless life to his life of knowledge and thought.
Montag does everything in his power to read, to memorize, to learn, and to think for himself.
He talks to Clarisse and it shows him how to think for himself but when he talks to Beaty again he almost started to slide back into his mindless trance. Beaty makes everything sound right even though it's wrong. Clarisse's thoughts came from her heart not just deceitful facts or lies. His inner struggle is hard but he is facing not just himself but Mildred, Beaty, and Faber, which makes the struggle even harder. He has to face his past to survive his future. He has to look past the technologies, the easy ways out, and path of mindlessness and find the path that is truth to him. He has to find the very thing that makes others fear change but he has to ready to face the entire country and to d what is necessary to stay on his path.
By Britany Myers
No Religion + No Beliefs = Chaos
-Kody Heitz
Drawing Parallels - Gwen Montes
" The books that the world calls immoral are the books that show the world its own shame." Oscar Wilde
a very dynamic character.
Montag dramatically changed from an everyday working man to an adventerous person almost overnight. he had implications that something in his life wasn't right, but the events that were explained were points that pushed it over the top.
-Zach Spear
montag confusion and connection about clarisse and the women :) *sharief*
Paradoxes Bob Laing
Paradox= a statement or proposition that seems self-contradictory or absurd but in reality expresses a possible truth.
I remember one of the first things I wrote in my notes of Fahrenheit 451 was how I noticed Bradbury’s use of paradoxes to help the reader understand and think about the happenings of Fahrenheit 451. These Paradoxes really got me thinking and helped me understand more about the book. One of the first Paradoxes I noticed in Fahrenheit 451 was how Bradbury used these paradoxical statements to describe the “Snake” stomach pump and, later in the book the Mechanical Hound. These paradoxes question the reality of people and things that appear to be living but are spiritually dead. Mildred and the rest of her society seem to be very machine-like, thinking only what they are told to think and relying on government controlled technology and papers to get their information. The culture of Fahrenheit 451 is a culture of fake happiness and Montag is trying to escape this fake happiness and seek more substantial truths in the books he is beginning to read. Also in the beginning of The Hearth and the Salamander, Montag’s bedroom is described as “not empty” and then it is described as “indeed empty” I believe that Montag feels this sense of emptiness because Mildred is physically in the bedroom, but her thoughts and feelings are not present in the bedroom. Bradbury’s repeated use of these paradoxes is usually used to describe Mildred’s acts, suggesting that her empty and almost zombie like actions are those of everyone else in this society. Mildred is our connection to the society and culture of the people in this new world that Bradbury has created.
I believe that we will see many more paradoxes through the rest of the book. I also hope that these paradoxes will help you to take a deeper look at Fahrenheit 451.
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Have I changed? Kenzie*(:
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Clarisse McClellen: MIA by sydneyyyy :)
These are just some of my many thoughts on this situation. I do not think we should let this situation slip our minds because I believe Clarisse is not dead . . .just MIA.
Leave comments please! peaceee, syd:)
Saturday, October 10, 2009
The Late and Great Clarisse McClellan
To most people in the story, Clarisse was weird, different, or any other word for odd that you could find in a thesaurus. However, to one outside of the story, she reminds him of himself. I know that's true for me as well. I believe very strongly in freedom of speech. If I want to write a story or a song, I will not generate it so it will please everyone under the sun. To me, when people are offended, it brings out the most creativity in them. An example of this would be Uncle Tom's Cabin. Harriet Beecher Stowe, most likely, was quite offended by slavery. She then created one of the most prominent antislavery books of all time.
Familiarity conquers the weak that will not seek the unusual. What i mean by this is that people tend to lean towards what their used to, as opposed to thinking for themselves. I believe my statement directly relates to Fahrenheit 451. However, Clarisse is exactly the opposite of it. Because of her family, she breaks the mold of usual behavior. I hope that Guy will stay on the path he's on right now and will make my statement false as well.
Well, I hope that my blog will make you think. Write some comments; I would love to respond to them. Happy blogging!
*Devyn Font
Friday, October 9, 2009
I'm lost in this book....
Confessing their unhappiness
I think that to a certain extent Montag up to this point had been like Mildred. He thought that he was happy, but yet he still had been taking books for the past year. This shows that he hasn't really been happy, but he refused to admit it to himself until just recently. Once he and Mildrid begin really reading the books i believe he will continue to take the books and both of their characters will change drastically, as far as accepting their happiness. I expect that they will both realize how wrong their goverment is and that there really is no need to ban the books like they did. People just have to deal with being offended without taking these drastic measures, becasue it is not meant to target anyone in particular.
I also conclude that Beatty owns and reads books himself, because so far in the book we've seen Beatty quote litterature. We've also seen him talk about the past history of our country. This makes me think that he has to be reading wether he has been permited to for job purposes or illegaly like Montag, Mildred and many others in the society.
Ellie♥
Thursday, October 8, 2009
In Mildred's Shoes
♫♪ Danielle Slagle ♪♫
Individuality?
If you think about how many freedoms we have in America today, they're all linked back to the constitutional rights we're given at birth. In Fahrenheit 451, it becomes alright (and arguably necessary, says the government) to take away the freedom of press, which leads to people becoming robots that can't think for themselves. If this were to happen today, and with the scary parallels between the book and our lifestyle, it isn't too far-fetched, it would become a gateway to taking away other things. When books get taken away, opinions are repressed. If opinions are repressed, people can forget that there are opinions other than their own. Ideas wouldn't be shared, and individuality would be essentially taken away. Our freedoms define who we are; from our hairstyles, clothes, and make-up, to what we read, etc. When we are denied the right to read books, that's the first step in taking away who we are as individual people.
In relation to the book, I believe that's how it got started. As we can tell, everyone in Montag's time thinks, acts, dresses, and even physically looks the same. Isn't this eerily similar to peer pressure and such today?
~Courtney Neuenschwander (:
Is American on its way to becoming like Fahrenheit 451? By Miranda Rickard
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
Are Everyone's Toes Feeling Okay?
When searching for clues about the cause of all the suppression a very good place to start seems to be page 57 when Beatty goes to visit Montag and speaks to him about minorities in their civilization. He says the following:
"...Bigger the population, the more minorities...the bigger your market, Montag, the less you handle controversy, remember that! All minor minor minorities with their navels to be kept clean....books, so the critics said, were dishwater. No wonder books stopped selling. But the public, knowing what it wanted, spinning happily, let the comic books survive...There you have it, Montag. It didn't come from the Government down. There was no dictum, no declaration, no censorship to start with, no! Technology, mass exploitation, and minority pressure carried the trick, thank God. Today, thanks to them you can stay happy all the time."
The first thing this passage points out is that censorship did not start with the Government. It started with the entire population of people trying to make all the minorities within the community happy and unoffended. Books became "dishwater" so washed down and diluted that they weren't really even books anymore. People stopped thinking and allowed this to happen with out question. Therefore, it was very simple for regulations and cultural changes to be made by the government. And though people seem to be happy in their ignorance, their lives were actually very unfulfilled in many places.
Our society today is quickly rushing toward a fate similar to the situation in the book. We are so focused on not offending anyone that we have to constantly stop and think about what we say and do.This is not a bad thing most of the time, but sometimes forced regulation can have negative effects even if the intentions were meant for good. Words are banned from culture because they could have racial slurs if used in a certain manner. Art and literature are taken from the shelves of public places because they contain things that might make someone out there in the world uncomfortable. These uncomfortable truths are not things that should be avoided or taken lightly. Instead of avoiding things that make us squeamish when we think about them, we should embrace and learn about them. If we don't, we run a very high risk of becoming a society of robots and machines that do not stop to ponder the world as it rushes by our over stimulated lives, much like the people in the book.
---Taylor
True Happiness by Linzey Rice
The End.
:)
The Dangers of Political Correctness. By- Austin Reichert
The Hearth and the Salamander
Go beyond the surface and really explain what you think.
Saturday, October 3, 2009
Welcome!
Our current topic: anything that has to do with Fahrenheit 451 and the world as it relates.
Your requirements: Post at least ONCE EVERY TWO WEEKS. This can be a brand new post (make sure you include a title with the topic) or it can be a response to someone else's post (make sure you click COMMENTS and leave the response there. Grammar counts!! :-)
NOTE: YOU MUST SIGN YOUR NAME WHEN YOU POST IF YOU SIGN IN AND CREATE A NEW POST!